Semaglutide, the Magic Pill Against Obesity: Truth or Fallacy?

Jesse Oswald • February 25, 2024

Key Points

  • Pharmacological treatments for adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2 or ≥ 27kg/m2 in those with an obesity-related comorbidity can provide a valuable adjunct to diet and exercise.
  • Semaglutide is a GLP-1 agonist recently approved for obesity treatment and is the most effective among the other FDA-approved anti-obesity medications.
  • The main side effects of semaglutide administration are transient and mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.
  • Semaglutide administration can lead to significant losses of muscle mass and considerable loss of total and visceral fat mass.

 

Obesity is a highly prevalent, multifactorial, chronic, relapsing disease that affects 650 million adults globally, translating into approximately 30% of men and 35% of women. Obesity requires long-term management and is associated with several physical and mental health complications. Specifically, it can lead to insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is also associated with reduced life expectancy, mainly due to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Although lifestyle intervention (diet and exercise) represents the cornerstone of obesity management, sustaining weight loss over the long term is challenging. Most overweight or obese people typically achieve only modest weight loss that is often regained, thus going through countless weight loss failures. Notably, it has been demonstrated that weight loss through lifestyle modification usually plateaus at a level of 5%-10% and is associated with a high risk of relapse, which may be related to metabolic adaptation. Although weight loss of 5%-10% is linked to improvements in cardiovascular risk factors, type-2 diabetes, and quality of life, weight losses beyond 10% produce even greater health benefits, including remission of type-2 diabetes and reductions in cardiovascular (CVD) events. As such, weight loss of ≥ 10%-15% is recommended in people with complications of overweight and obesity, such as cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, NAFLD, and type-2 diabetes.


Therefore, pharmacological treatments for people unable to achieve such weight loss goals only with a comprehensive weight loss program provide a valuable adjunct to lifestyle interventions. Clinical guidelines suggest adjunctive pharmacotherapy (anti-obesity medications) with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity for adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2 or ≥ 27kg/m2 in those with an obesity-related comorbidity such as type-2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia.


The current medications approved for chronic weight management in the US or Europe are orlistat, phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion, liraglutide 3.0 mg, and semaglutide 2.4 mg. While the first four generally produce an average of 4%-8% greater weight loss than lifestyle interventions alone (2.6 kg to 8.8 kg in one year), semaglutide appears to increase this value to 15%, translating into a mean weight loss of 12.5kg from baseline weight after 68 weeks. Semaglutide given for two years resulted in substantial and sustained changes in body weight versus lifestyle interventions alone (-15.2% vs. -2.6%), encouraging long-term weight loss maintenance. Taken together, results show semaglutide to be the most effective currently approved for weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity.


Both liraglutide and semaglutide are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists. GLP-1 is a gut hormone released in response to food intake, acting as a satiety signal in the brain, thus regulating energy homeostasis. Moreover, it controls glucose metabolism by stimulating insulin release and inhibiting glucagon secretion. For chronic weight management, liraglutide is administered subcutaneously at a dose of 3.0 mg daily. In comparison, semaglutide has a more long-acting effect and is administered subcutaneously at a dose of 2.4 mg weekly. Although both have been shown to reduce energy intake, decrease hunger and food cravings as well as increase feelings of satiety, semaglutide has the most potent effect.


Liraglutide was the first GLP-1 agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management after demonstrating weight losses of 4%-6% over that achieved with lifestyle intervention alone after 20-56 weeks. Semaglutide, on the other hand, was initially approved by the FDA in 2017 under the brand name Ozempic for the treatment of type-2 diabetes and for reducing classical cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., blood pressure, lipid levels), thus the risk of cardiovascular events in persons with type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Moreover, a once-daily oral version of the medication, at a maximum dose of 14 mg, was approved for treating type-2 diabetes in the US in 2019 and in Europe in 2020. Semaglutide lowers blood glucose and improves HbA1c via stimulating insulin and suppressing glucagon secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, leading to lower blood glucose levels with a low risk for hypoglycemia.


In June 2021, the FDA approved semaglutide as an adjunct to reduced calorie intake and increased physical activity for chronic weight management since scientific evidence demonstrated an extra 12.4% weight loss compared with other anti-obesity medications. Weight loss with semaglutide was also accompanied by greater improvements with respect to cardiometabolic risk factors, including reductions in waist circumference, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c), and lipid levels as well as a greater decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation. Therefore, it is becoming evident that semaglutide can be very useful for people with overweight and obesity complications (e.g., prediabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea) who require weight losses of 10% to 15% or more to alleviate these complications.


Currently, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg is approved for use in Canada, Europe, the UK, and the USA under the brand name Wigovy as an adjunct to a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management in adults with obesity (BMI ≥30kg/m2) or overweight (initial BMI ≥27kg/m2) with at least one weight-related comorbidity.

Growing data has demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg in individuals who are overweight or obese. The main side effect is the possibility of GI symptoms, which are typically transient and mild-to-moderate in severity. The chief safety issues with drugs of this class are the rare occurrence of pancreatitis and a prohibition of use in patients with a personal or family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or medullary thyroid carcinoma.


Another safety issue that has emerged and deserves discussion is the quality of weight loss with semaglutide. The usual proportion of lean mass loss in total weight loss is 25%. In the semaglutide-treated participants, a mean loss of 8.36 kg of total body fat mass and 5.26 kg of total body lean mass was observed, meaning that lean mass accounted for approximately 39% of total weight, substantially higher than ideal. Intriguingly, this average proportion was also applicable to even less total weight loss, meaning that in cases of <15% weight loss, muscle mass loss may be even equal to fat mass loss. This is concerning since a decrease in muscle mass is associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia and frailty, especially in older patients, with a higher likelihood of weight regain after weight loss as well as with an increased risk for elevated blood glucose levels, thus type-2 diabetes. Therefore, it is preferable to predominantly reduce body fat without significant loss of muscle mass when losing weight. The fact that semaglutide results in increased losses in muscle mass also does not take away the significant decreases in total fat mass (-19.3% from baseline) and visceral fat mass (-27.4% from baseline). It just highlights the importance of diet and physical activity, which should always be the first line of treatment for obesity, and even in cases where the criteria of pharmacological interventions are met, to complement the medical prescription closely.


Overall, semaglutide and other anti-obesity medications are not a panacea and should only be used by obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2 or overweight adults with a BMI ≥ 27kg/m2 with at least one obesity-related comorbidity. Moreover, the importance of combining lifestyle modifications such as dietary and physical activity should not be ignored in obesity treatment. Dietary modification and physical activity of at least 150-250 minutes/week are fundamental for the long-term management of obesity and should always be prioritized or at least be utilized adjunctively to pharmacotherapy.

 

References


  • Bergmann NC, Davies MJ, Lingvay I, Knop FK. Semaglutide for the treatment of overweight and obesity: A review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(1):18-35. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14863
  • Chao AM, Tronieri JS, Amaro A, Wadden TA. Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023;33(3):159-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.12.008
  • Deng Y, Park A, Zhu L, Xie W, Pan CQ. Effect of semaglutide and liraglutide in individuals with obesity or overweight without diabetes: a systematic review. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022;13:20406223221108064. DOI: 10.1177/20406223221108064
  • Lingvay I, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, Deanfield J, Emerson SS, Esbjerg S, Hardt-Lindberg S, Hovingh GK, Kahn SE, Kushner RF, Lincoff AM, Marso SP, Fries TM, Plutzky J, Ryan DH. Semaglutide for cardiovascular event reduction in people with overweight or obesity: SELECT Study baseline characteristics. Obesity (Silver Spring).2023;31(1):111-122. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23621
  • Ryan DH. Next generation antiobesity medications: Setmelanotide, Semaglutide, Tirzepatide and Bimagrumab: What do they mean for clinical practice? J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021;30(3):196-208. DOI: 10.7570/jomes21033
  • Ryan DH, Lingvay I, Colhoun HM, Deanfield J, Emerson SS, Kahn SE, Kushner RF, Marso S, Plutzky J, Brown-Frandsen K, Gronning MOL, Hovingh JK, Holst AG, Ravn H, Lincoff AM. Semaglutide effects on cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight or obesity (SELECT) rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2020;229:61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.07.008
  • Uchiyama S, Sada Y, Mihara S, Sasaki Y, Sone M, Tanaka Y. Oral semaglutide induces loss of body fat mass without affecting muscle mass in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Med Res. 2023;15(7):377-383. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4987
  • Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, Lingvay I, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wadden TA, Wharton S, Yokote K. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:989-1002. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
  • Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, Davies M, Van Gaal LF, McGowan BM, Rosenstock J, Tran MTD, Wharton S, Yokote K, Zeuthen N, Kushner RF. Impact of semaglutide on body composition in adults with overweight or obesity: Explanatory Analysis of the STEP 1 Study. J Endrocr Soc. 2021;5(Suppl1):A16-A17. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab048.030

An Ounce of Prevention - Hyperion Health Blog

A woman is helping an older woman do exercises on an exercise ball in a gym.
By Jesse Oswald January 29, 2025
What is a Kinesiologist?
A woman is wearing an oxygen mask while running on a treadmill.
By Jesse Oswald January 20, 2025
Highlights Healthcare expenses are skyrocketing, with consumers and employers facing the significant brunt. Identifying those likely to get sick is critical as our resource-strapped healthcare system should focus on those likely to become the most significant burden to the system. VO2 max is a crucial longevity indicator that can also accurately predict healthcare expenses. The rampant chronic disease epidemic and the resulting surge in medical expenses is one of the most dire problems of modern societies, probably only second to climate change. Healthcare inflation is on a meteoric rise, and for those with limited or no healthcare coverage, a medical emergency is the equivalent of personal bankruptcy. A dire problem for employers In the US, employers and consumers who face rising health insurance premiums and astronomical out-of-pocket medical expenses feel the brunt of rising healthcare costs. Such is the problem that even large, well-capitalized corporations choose to send employees overseas for specific medical procedures since the cost of traveling and treatment in a foreign country is lower than the cost of care in the US. Another startling example is the infamous "northern caravan," a term that describes people with diabetes in the northern states who travel to Canada to secure their insulin supply. According to McKinsey , a survey conducted among over 300 employers highlighted that the average increase in the cost of health benefits over the past three years has been within the range of 6 to 7 percent. This survey also indicated that any rate increases exceeding 4 to 5 percent were deemed unsustainable. Interestingly, 95 percent of the surveyed employers expressed willingness to contemplate reducing benefits if costs surged by 4 percent or more. The primary cost-control measures that these employers indicated they might explore included elevating the portion of premium costs covered by employees and a potential transition to high-deductible health plans. Why is Breath Analysis relevant? Vis-a-vis this problem, the early and accurate estimation of who will get sick and how much they will cost is as critical as the treatment itself. The reason is that no other method of accurately identifying at-risk populations exists; it helps focus our scarce prevention resources and attention on those most in need. Breath analysis, AKA VO2max or metabolic testing, is an assessment that reveals two key biomarkers that provide significant predictive value for one's likelihood of developing costly chronic conditions. These two biomarkers are VO2max and the Respiratory Exchange Ratio. In this article, we will dive into VO2max to understand why it's a critical reflection of our overall health and, consequently, a window into our future healthcare spend. What is VO2max? Let's start with the basics. What is VO2max? VO2 max is the maximum amount of oxygen the human body can absorb. It is measured in terms of milliliters of oxygen consumed per kilogram of body weight. The below formula below indicates how VO2max is calculated: The numerator indicates the volume of oxygen your heart, lungs, and cells can absorb, expressed in milliliters per minute. The denominator indicates the weight of the individual represented in kilograms. 
There are many different types of fats in this picture.
By Jesse Oswald January 13, 2025
Key points A total fat intake between 20-35% ensures sufficient intake of essential fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins Omega-6 PUFAs are primarily found in vegetable oils, while omega-3 PUFAs are primarily found in fatty fish and fish oils Both omega-3 PUFAs and MUFAs have established benefits for cardiovascular disease TFAs are the only dietary lipids that have a strong positive relationship with cardiovascular disease Omega-3 PUFA supplementation increases the beneficial bacteria of the human microbiome Over the last three decades, there has been a great revolution against fat due to its suspected association with several nutritional health issues, especially cardiovascular disease. There was a tremendous amount of evidence that indicated dietary cholesterol and saturated fat as the main culprits of cardiovascular disease, thus morbidity and mortality. It was when all the low-fat and no-fat dairy products started to launch, promising even complete substitution of the cholesterol-lowering heart medication if these products were exclusively consumed. Let’s start from the beginning. Dietary fat intake can vary significantly and still meet energy and nutrient needs. International guidelines suggest a total fat intake between 20% and 35% of the daily caloric consumption. This range ensures sufficient intake of essential fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins. Not only does the quantity of the ingested fat matter, but most importantly, its quality. Some dietary fats have beneficial effects, with a significant role in maintaining good health, while others may threaten it. Which are, after all, the dietary fats? Dietary fats is a rather heterogeneous group of organic compounds, including four main types of fat, which are elaborately described in the following sections of this article. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have two or more carbon-carbon double bonds. Omega-6 PUFAs and omega-3 PUFAs are the main types of PUFAs and are classified according to the location of the first unsaturated bond (sixth and third carbon atom, respectively). Alpha-Linolenic acid (ALA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are the most important omega-3 PUFAs. ALA is an essential fatty acid that can only be obtained from diet and can be converted into EPA and then to DHA, but the rate of this conversion is finite, approximately 7.0%–21% for EPA and 0.01%–1% for DHA. In the same way, the most important omega-6 PUFAs are linoleic acid (LA) and arachidonic acid (ARA). LA is an essential fatty acid that, in order to give rise to ARA, needs to be ingested through the diet as the human body cannot synthesize it. The recommended intake for total PUFA ranges between 5% and 10% of the total energy intake, while a total omega-3 PUFA intake of 0.5%–2% and a total omega-6 PUFA intake of 2.5%-5% is suggested. A dietary ratio of omega−6/omega−3 PUFA is recommended to be 1:1–2:1 to balance their competing roles and achieve health benefits. Omega-6 and omega-3 PUFAs Omega-6 PUFAs, in the form of LA, are plentiful in most crop seeds and vegetable oils, such as canola, soybean, corn, and sunflower oils. In contrast to omega-6 PUFAs, omega-3 PUFAs are obtained from a limited range of dietary sources. Flax, chia, and perilla seeds are rich in ALA, with significant amounts also detected in green leafy vegetables. The consumption of fatty fish, such as salmon, sardines, tuna, trout, and herring, provides high amounts of EPA and DHA. Besides fish and their oils, small amounts of omega-3 PUFAs are also detected in red meat like beef, lamb, and mutton. All the above dietary sources provide EPA, DPA, DHA, LA, and ARA in different amounts, and their intake is necessary for normal physiological function. PUFAs play a critical role in many chronic diseases, affecting human cells by regulating inflammation, immune response, and angiogenesis. Omega-3 PUFAs’ role against hypertriglyceridemia has been clarified, and research indicates that systematically consuming oily fish can contribute to general heart protection. Supplementation with omega-3 PUFAs could potentially lower the risk of several cardiovascular outcomes, but the evidence is stronger for individuals with established coronary heart disease. Moreover, adequate EPA and DHA levels are necessary for brain anatomy, metabolism, and function. Although the mechanisms underlying omega-3 PUFAs' cardioprotective effects are still poorly understood, several studies have been conducted in this direction. Unfortunately, that does not hold true for their omega-6 counterparts, for which controversial emerging data tend to show anti-inflammatory behavior that needs to be further studied. Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) In contrast to PUFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) are easily produced by the liver in response to the ingestion of carbohydrates. The main MUFA is oleic acid, found in plant sources, such as olive oil, olives, avocado, nuts, and seeds, while minimal amounts are also present in meat, eggs, and dairy products. Specific guidelines around MUFAs’ dietary consumption do not exist. Therefore, MUFAs are recommended to cover the remaining fat intake requirements to reach the total daily fat intake goal. A growing body of research shows that dietary MUFAs reduce or prevent the risk of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and hypertension by positively affecting insulin sensitivity, blood lipid levels, and blood pressure, respectively. Moreover, olive oil contains several bioactive substances, possessing anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant qualities. According to a meta-analysis, consuming olive oil was linked to a lower risk of developing any sort of cancer, especially breast cancer and cancer of the digestive system. Another study found that an isocaloric replacement of 5% of the energy from saturated fatty acids (SFAs) with plant MUFAs led to an 11% drop in cancer mortality over a 16-year follow-up period. Therefore, including MUFAs in the everyday diet offers multifaceted benefits in chronic disease prevention and management, including cancer and general health promotion.  Saturated fatty acids (SFAs) Saturated fatty acids (SFAs) form a heterogeneous group of fatty acids that contain only carbon-to-carbon single bonds. Whole-fat dairy, (unprocessed) red meat, milk chocolate, coconut, and palm kernel oil are all SFA-rich foods. These fatty acids have distinct physical and chemical profiles and varying effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Stearic, palmitic, myristic, and lauric acids are the principal SFAs found in most natural human diets. Dietary practice and guidelines recommend limiting SFA intake to <10% of the total energy (E%), while the American Heart Association suggests an even lower intake of <7 E% because total saturated fat consumption and LDL-C levels are positively correlated. However, the role of SFAs in CVDs is quite complex, and the evidence is heterogeneous. In a recent study with a 10.6-year follow-up period, which included 195,658 participants, there was no proof that consuming SFAs was linked to developing CVD while replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat was linked to an increased risk of CVD. Moreover, according to 6 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cardiovascular outcomes and total mortality were not significantly impacted by substituting saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat. Even if these analyses were to be challenged, due to heterogenous evidence, the possible reduction in CVD risk associated with replacing SFAs with PUFAs in several studies may not necessarily be an outcome of SFAs’ negative effect but rather a potential positive benefit of PUFAs. Regarding SFAs' effect on different types of cancers, associations of their intake with an increased risk of prostate and breast cancer have been indicated. Conversely, a meta-analysis showed no link between SFA intake and a higher risk of colon cancer; similarly, consuming MUFAs, PUFAs, or total fat did not affect colon cancer risk. Hence, the role of SFA consumption in preventing, promoting, or having a neutral role in serious chronic diseases has not been fully elucidated yet. Trans fatty acids (TFAs) Trans fatty acids (TFAs) are created industrially by partially hydrogenating liquid plant oils or can be naturally derived from ruminant-based meat and dairy products. TFAs are highly found in commercial baked goods, biscuits, cakes, fried foods, etc. Guidelines regarding TFAs are stringent and limit TFA intake to <1% of energy or as low as possible. In 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration declared that industrial TFAs are no longer generally recognized as safe and should be eliminated from the food supply as their consumption is strongly linked to various CVD risk factors. Specifically, TFA intake raises triglycerides and increases inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and hepatic fat synthesis, leading to a significantly increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). A meta-analysis suggested that increased TFA intake led to an increase in total and LDL-cholesterol and a decrease in HDL-cholesterol concentrations. Data also indicates that TFAs may influence carcinogenesis through inflammatory pathways, but the reported data are debatable. A recent study investigated the effects of all types of dietary fat intake on CVD risk. While PUFA, MUFA, and SFA intake were not linked to higher CVD risk, dietary TFA intake showed a strong association with CVD risk. Analysis indicated PUFA intake and CVD risk were inversely correlated, and the relative risk of CVD was reduced by 5% in studies with a 10-year follow-up. Dietary lipids and the human microbiome Dietary lipids also affect human microbiota composition. Studies have identified a close association between the human microbiome and metabolic diseases, including obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diets with a high omega-6 PUFA, SFA, and TFA intake increase the amount of many detrimental bacteria in the microbiome and reduce the amount of the beneficial ones, altering the microbiota composition and inducing inflammation via the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These bacteria may disrupt the gut barrier function, allowing lipopolysaccharides (LPS) translocation, which are bacterial toxins. This condition is linked to metabolic perturbations such as dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and CVD. On the contrary, omega-3 PUFA (EPA and DHA) supplementation increases beneficial bacteria and limits harmful ones, enhancing intestinal barrier functioning and preventing LPS translocation and its implications. Omega-3 PUFA supplementation has also been studied as a means of mental health disorders management, but the evidence is still controversial. A possible protective impact of fish consumption on depression has been suggested by various studies, as well as a possible protective effect of dietary PUFAs on moderate cognitive impairment. A recent review of meta-analyses indicated that omega-3 PUFA supplementation might have potential value in mental health disorders, but data credibility is still weak. Dietary lipids and obesity Last but not least, obesity and its management is another field that dietary lipids intake seems to impact with their mechanisms. A diet high in PUFA has been shown to lower the total mass of subcutaneous white adipose tissue (the predominant fat type in human bodies), reduce blood lipid levels, and improve insulin sensitivity. In a study comparing PUFA and MUFA isocaloric intake, PUFA was more advantageous and lowered visceral adiposity in patients with central obesity. By stimulating brown adipose tissue, which aids energy expenditure through its elevated thermogenic activity, omega-3 PUFAs seem to elicit these positive effects in fat tissue, thus being useful in preventing and/or managing obesity. Another related study compared PUFA to SFA overfeeding in dietary surplus conditions that aimed to increase weight by 3%. While SFA overfeeding led to weight gain, primarily through the expansion of the visceral adipose tissue, PUFA overfeeding also led to weight gain, but because of a greater expansion of lean tissue mass. To sum up, dietary fats are an essential part of the human diet with many important physiologic functions, including cell function, hormone production, energy, and nutrient absorption. Moreover, dietary fat consumption is associated with positive outcomes in regard to cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, cancer, and depression. Therefore, there is no reason to demonize this valuable dietary component, incriminating it for irrelevant adverse health outcomes, primarily weight loss failure and obesity. References 1. Astrup A, Magkos F, Bier DM, Brenna JT, de Oliveira Otto MC, Hill JO, King JC, Mente A, Ordovas JM, Volek JS, Yusuf S, Krauss RM. Saturated fats and health: A reassessment and proposal for food-based recommendations: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(7):844-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.077 2. Bojková B, Winklewski PJ, Wszedybyl-Winlewska M. Dietary fat and cancer-Which is good, which is bad, and the body of evidence. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):4114. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21114114 3. Custers, Emma EM, Kiliaan, Amanda J. Dietary lipids from body to brain. Prog Lipid Res. 2022;85:101144. DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2021.101144 4. de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Kishibe T, Uleryk E, Budylowski P, Schünemann H, Beyene J, Anand SS. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2015;351:h3978. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3978 5. Gao X, Su X, Han X, Wen X, Cheng C, Zhang S, Li W, Cai J, Zheng L, Ma J, Liao M, Ni W, Liu T, Liu D, Ma W, Han S, Zhu S, Ye Y, Zeng F-F. Unsaturated fatty acids in mental disorders: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(6):2217-2236. DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac084 6. Liu AG, Ford NA, Hu FB, Zelman KM, Mozaffarian D, Kris-Etherton PM. A healthy approach to dietary fats: understanding the science and taking action to reduce consumer confusion. Nutr J. 2017;16(1):53. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-017-0271-4 7. Poli A, Agostoni C, Visioli F. Dietary fatty acids and inflammation: Focus on the n-6 series. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4567. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054567 8. Saini RK, Keum Y-S. Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Dietary sources, metabolism, and significance-A review. Life Sci. 2018;203:255-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.04.049 9. Saini RK, Prasad P, Sreedhar RV, Naidu KA, Shang X, Keum Y-S. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAS): Emerging plant and microbial sources, oxidative stability, bioavailability, and health benefits-A review. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(10):1627. DOI: 10.3390/antiox10101627 10. Zhao M, Chiriboga D, Olendzki B, Xie B, Li Y, McGonigal LJ, Maldonado-Contreras A, Ma Y. Substantial increase in compliance with saturated fatty acid intake recommendations after one year following the American Heart Association diet. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1486. DOI: 10.3390/nu10101486 11. Zhu Y, Bo Y, Liu Y. Dietary total fat, fatty acids intake, and risk of cardiovascular disease: a dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18:91. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1035-2
SHOW MORE